Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 14:44
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why would Joseph Smith say that polygamy was God's law?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What is the best eye serum for dark circles?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What should I do to get over a relationship?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Avalanche Signs Nelson - NHL.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Who would win in this boxing matchup between these two, Dillian Whyte or Samuel Peter?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Eating More of These Foods May Lower Your Cancer Risk by 8%, New Study Suggests - EatingWell